Showing posts with label perjury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label perjury. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 October 2025

Procedure of Perjury Proceedings

 Procedure of Perjury Proceedings 

(False Evidence / False Statement in Court)


Prepared By :

Adv. Usha Vats & Adv Manoj Parashar


Relevant Law:

Sections 191–193 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Define and punish perjury (giving false evidence).

Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Prescribes the procedure to take action for perjury.


1. Meaning of Perjury (False Evidence)

A person commits perjury when:

  • They make a false statement under oath or affirmation in court or before any authority legally competent to administer an oath,

  • And the statement is material to the proceeding,

  • And they knew it was false or did not believe it to be true.

Example:

If a witness knowingly gives a false statement during cross-examination, that’s perjury.


2. Legal Provisions Involved

Law

Section

Description

IPC

191

Giving false evidence

IPC

192

Fabrica>ng false evidence




IPC

193

Punishment (up to 7 years imprisonment and fine)

CrPC

195(1)(b)(i)

No court shall take cognizance of perjury unless initiated by the court itself

CrPC 

340

Procedure for court to make a complaint for perjury


3. Step-by-Step Procedure under Section 340 CrPC

Step 1: Detection by Court

  • The court (civil, criminal, or tribunal) no>ces that someone has knowingly given false evidence or fabricated evidence in its proceedings.

Step 2: Preliminary Inquiry

  • The court may conduct a preliminary inquiry (not a full trial) to verify:

  • Whether false evidence was indeed given, and

  • Whether it is expedient in the interest of justice to prosecute.

Step 3: Recording of Findings

  • The court records its findings in writing that:

  • (a) An offence appears to have been commi\ed under Sec>on 191–193 IPC, and

  • (b) It is necessary to prosecute the person.

Step 4: Complaint in Writing

  • The court then files a written complaint to the Magistrate of First Class having jurisdic>on, as per Section 340(1)(b) CrPC.

Step 5: Magistrate Takes Cognizance

  • The Magistrate takes cognizance of the complaint under Section 343 CrPC, and proceeds to:

  • Examine the witnesses,

  • Frame charges under IPC 191–193, and

  • Conduct the trial for perjury.

Step 6: Punishment

  • If convicted under Section 193 IPC, punishment can be:

  • Up to 7 years imprisonment, and

  • Fine.


4. Who Can File?

Under Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC:

  • Only the concerned court (where perjury occurred), Or 

  • Any higher court to which it is subordinate, can initiate perjury proceedings.


Private persons cannot directly file perjury cases - they can only move an application to the court requesting it to act under Sec>on 340 CrPC.


5. Important Case Laws


Case

Principle

Citation

Chajoo Ram v. Radhey Shyam

Perjury should not be initiated lightly; must be expedient in the interest of justice

AIR 1971 SC 1367

Iqbal Singh Marwah v.

Meenakshi Marwah

False evidence before a court requires sanction under Sec. 195; civil forgery outside court may not

(2005) 4 SCC 370

M.S. Ahlawat v. State of Haryana

Court must record finding and follow Sec. 340 procedure strictly

(2000) 1 SCC 278

State of Punjab v. Jasbir Singh

Perjury proceedings are not to be used to threaten witnesses

(2020) 12 SCC 96


6. Key Points to Remember

  • The offence of perjury cannot be privately prosecuted.

  • The court’s discretion is crucial — it acts only if justice demands.

  • The false statement must be material to the issue.

  • The intention to mislead must be proven.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Model Draft Application under Section 340 CrPC


IN THE COURT OF ___________ 

(Name of the Court)

At: ___________

Case No.: ___________


In the matter of:

[Your Name] — Applicant/Petitioner

Versus

[Name of the Opposite Party / Witness] — Respondent


APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 340 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 READ WITH SECTION 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC FOR INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 191 & 193 IPC FOR GIVING FALSE EVIDENCE


MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the above titled matter is pending before this Hon’ble Court and during the course of proceedings, the Respondent/Accused/Witness has knowingly given false evidence and/or filed false affidavits/documents before this Hon’ble Court.


2. That the said false statement/document was material to the issue under consideration and was made wilfully and deliberately with the intention to mislead this Hon’ble Court and to obstruct the due course of justice.


3. That the falsehood of the said statement/document is apparent from the record, as evident from:

  • (a) The contradiction between the affidavit dated _______ and the deposition dated _______; and 

  • (b) Documentary evidence such as _______.


4. That such acts constitute offences under Sections 191 and 193 of the Indian Penal Code, i.e., giving and fabricating false evidence.


5. That in terms of Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except upon a complaint in writing of this Hon’ble Court.


6. That it is therefore expedient in the interest of justice that appropriate proceedings be initiated against the Respondent under Sections 191 & 193 IPC, as contemplated under Section 340 CrPC.


PRAYER

In view of the foregoing, the Applicant most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:

  • 1. Hold a preliminary inquiry under Sec>on 340 CrPC to determine whether an offence of perjury has been commi\ed;

  • 2. Upon such finding, file a written complaint before the competent Magistrate under Section 343 CrPC; and

  • 3. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of jus>ce.


Place: ___________

Date: ___________



(Signature)

[Name of Applicant]

Through Counsel: ____________________

Advocate Enrollment No.: ___________


Enclosures (if applicable):

1. Copy of affidavit/deposi>on alleged to be false

2. Copies of contradictory evidence

3. Supporting documents and court orders

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thursday, 16 October 2025

Landmark Judgments on Perjury (False Evidence)

Landmark Judgments on Perjury (False Evidence)


1. James Kunjwal v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr. Citation: 2024 INSC 601; [2024] 8 S.C.R. 332

Facts: The appellant was accused of offences under Sections 376 and 504 IPC. A perjury complaint was filed against him based on alleged false statements in his affidavit.

Principle: The Supreme Court held that perjury under Section 193 IPC requires substantial evidence of deliberate falsehood on a matter of substance with malafide intent. Mere denial or inaccuracies do not constitute perjury. 

Significance: Establishes threshold for initiating perjury proceedings, protecting individuals from frivolous prosecution.


2. Umrao Lal v. State Citation: AIR 1953 All 603

Facts: The accused made false statements during trial, later etracted them. Question arose whether perjury was complete upon initial falsehood.

Principle: A person commits perjury if, at the time of making a statement, they knew it to be false or did not believe it to be true. Retraction does not erase the offence.

Significance: Defines the mens rea (mental element) required for perjury—knowledge or belief of falsehood.


3. Chajoo Ram v. Radhey Shyam Citation: AIR 1971 SC 1367

Facts: Complaint for perjury filed alleging false evidence during a civil dispute.

Principle: The Supreme Court emphasized that perjury proceedings should not be used to pressurize or harass parties. They must be initiated only when falsehood is deliberate and material.

Significance: Landmark case discouraging misuse of perjury provisions.


4. K.T.M.S. Mohd. v. Union of India Citation: (1992) 3 SCC 178 

Facts: False declaration made during investigation under Income Tax laws. Perjury complaint filed.

Principle: False statement must be deliberate and on a material point. Intent and effect on administration of justice are critical.

Significance: Clarifies what constitutes a 'material statement' under perjury law.


5. Murray & Co. v. Ashok Kr. Newatia Citation: (2000) 2 SCC 367

Facts: Party submitted false affidavit before the Supreme Court. Court examined whether perjury proceedings should be initiated.

Principle: Deliberate attempt to mislead the Court amounts to contempt as well as perjury. Truth is the foundation of justice.

Significance: Strengthens the role of truth in judicial proceedings and encourages courts to act against false affidavits.


Suggested Pleading Points for Perjury Complaints

  • 1. Show that the false statement is material and affects the case outcome.

  • 2. Establish deliberate intent or knowledge of falsity.

  • 3. Highlight evidence proving malafide or dishonest purpose.

  • 4. Provide substantial proof such as affidavits, contradictions, or records.

  • 5. Ensure compliance with Section 195 CrPC procedural requirements.

  • 6. Clearly identify the relief sought—initiation of prosecution or setting aside of tainted order.


Suggested Pleading Points / Issues to Raise

When drafting a perjury complaint (or defending one), you should consider including or addressing the following points:

1. Matter of Substance

  • o Show that the false statement is material to the matter — not trivial or irrelevant.

  • o Link how it affects the outcome of the case or legal right.


2. Deliberate Falsehood / Knowledge / Belief

  • o Plead facts showing the accused knew or must have known that the statement is false, or did not believe it to be true.

  • o If possible, show that the statement was made despite contradictory evidence or due knowledge.


3. Malafide Intent

  • o Need to show the false statement was made with some dishonest purpose, or to gain advantage, mislead the Court, or thwart justice.

  • o Plead contextual facts, e.g., relationship with adversary, personal gain, prior false statements, etc.


4. Substantial Evidence

  • o Produce documentary evidence, records, affidavits, cross-examinations, etc.

  • o Mere suspicion, inconsistency, or denial without corroboration generally won’t suffice (James Kunjwal).


5. Legal Provision & Jurisdiction

  • o Identify the appropriate IPC Section (e.g., Section 191 / 193 IPC), and ensure compliance with procedure under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC when required (if cognizable courts cannot take cognizance except with court/authorized officer or complaint by Court / authorized officer). 


6. Temporal Element

  • o Show when the false statement was made. If made during deposition / affidavit. When cross-examined or opportunity for correction came. Show that when a statement was made, no belief in its truth existed.


7. Opportunity for Defence

  • o Include material for possible explanation; whether the accused was given a chance to explain or protest.

  • o To show absence of malafide, etc.


8. Relief Sought 

  • o Clearly seek either registration of complaint, criminal proceedings under perjury provisions, costs, maybe impact of false statement (e.g., nullifying order obtained based on it), etc.

----------------------------------------------------------


Cosmic CRF Ltd. vs Myotic Trading Pvt. Ltd. and Ors - Since, this has something to do with factual errors, the bar of review should not come in the way of the NCLAT.

   SCI (2025.08.01) in Cosmic CRF Ltd. vs Myotic Trading Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. [(2025) ibclaw.in 308 SC, Civil Appeal No.9900 of 2025 ] held t...